Scorpion SA-680 Black Widow 10-80m Antenna

I had a long weekend commute on quiet highways from 2006-2009. So, surfing the HF bands was a great way to help the drive pass. I was using a Yaesu ATAS-120A. Performance-wise, it can be described as “adequate, but  not great.” With my Yaesu FT-857D, tuning the ATAS was as simple as pressing a “TUNE” button… or what could be called an “EASY” button.  😉  I made some distant contacts with that antenna, even toward the bottom of the solar cycle. I took a break from HF when I was stationed closer to home; my interest in ham radio comes and goes. Eventually, I decided I wanted a better antenna. Some say the Scorpion SA-680 is the best mobile HF antenna money can buy. I decided to find out.

The Scorpion SA-680 comes standard in stainless steel. I paid extra for the “Black Widow,” which is powder coated in gloss black. Each antenna is made to order. So, I paid and waited. I got my antenna in about six weeks. It was packaged in a manner that would allow it to endure almost anything… VERY impressive. I ordered a capacity hat, too, which came in its own PVC pipe packaging. My setup is for part-time use. So, everything is easily removed when not in use. I had originally planned to mount my Scorpion on a roof rack. Setting up the rack isn’t necessarily fast, but it is easy enough to call “temporary.” Mounted on the roof rack, the SA-680 is obnoxiously tall, but still within the highway-legal limit of less than 13’6″ with the cap hat mounted (the whip would exceed max height allowances). However, I was unable to tune all of the bands.

In particular, 20m wasn’t even close to tuning. The match was terrible. That was most likely due to a lack of sufficient bonding between the rack and the body of the car. I tried straps to threaded points in the door jambs (see photos below), but they weren’t enough. I was unwilling to remove paint or make the mechanical modification needed to improve my bonding. I’m a Volkswagen enthusiast first, ham radio ranks further down my list of passions. Therefore, I abandoned roof rack mounting and moved to the hitch.

The hitch is probably the least efficient place to mount an HF antenna. But it seems to be my best option, given my desire to use the antenna as a part-time accessory. The hitch is far more convenient than the roof rack as a “temporary” mounting point. If you have a hitch, then you know that installing a ball mount is super-easy. My ball mounts are hollow and have internal threaded anti-rattle devices. Rather than a pin, I secure my mounts with a 1/2-inch bolt, capped with lock washers and a nut. It’s VERY sturdy and nearly impossible to wiggle loose without me noticing. Given the double-nut and two-inch bolt, I don’t think I can drive long enough between rest stops for the bolt to work its way out of the antenna mount.  😉 The aluminum spacer shown in this photo is a quick-release mount that used to be offered by Breedlove Mounts. It is no longer available. I bought it for ease of mounting/dismounting when the antenna was on the roof. If I’m honest, it isn’t necessary when mounting on the hitch. The 3/4″ bolt will hold fine, so long as you tighten it appropriately.

Bonding the antenna would be a challenge, or so I thought. Bonding straps are best kept short. However, there is no short path from the ball mount to the body of the car. There’s a lot of plastic back there. I decided to use the hitch itself as a bonding point. It’s fastened to the body at nine points, seven of which are at the factory impact bar locations. Electrically, the hitch is certainly grounded… but would it make a good RF ground? The answer turned out to be YES. I concluded this by connecting a bonding strap to the hitch and then comparing SWR readings with and without additional (and longer) bonding straps to body points farther under the car. The additional straps made no difference; so, I removed them. I also bonded the doors, hood, and exhaust system. See photos below.

For my first test, I compared results during a local 10m net that I’ve joined. Net control is ~15 miles away from my usual operating position. Ten meters is “nearly dead” for the time being. So, all tests were via ground waves. Using my ATAS-120A, I could just barely hear net control; he was a weak signal that was buried in the noise. He could barely hear me, as well. I told him via e-mail that I had never used 10m before and was surprised by all of the noise. He said it’s normal. A few weeks later, I went back to the same spot with my Scorpion. The first thing I noticed was a substantially-reduced noise floor. I’m told that’s because of the high “Q-factor” of the antenna. I could hear net control very well, easily a 5×5. He said I sounded much better, too. I think he gave me a 5×5 signal report.

Field Day was the next weekend. I operated for just an hour from a small peninsula in southeast Virginia and managed to make seven HF contacts. Six were on 20m, with the farthest being ~1000 miles away in Texas. I made a contact to North Carolina on 80m, which is a new band for me. [edit: 8/16/2021] So far, my most distant contact was to Slovenia, over 4500 miles (7200 km) away. [/edit] I’m tempted to install a 500-watt amplifier. Perhaps that will give me just a tad more “punch” to be heard in the distance. But pulling an additional 80 amps through my car’s electrical system would possibly introduce a new set of challenges. These are all things I must consider before stuffing more electronics into this small car.

I eventually tried a larger, 35-inch, 12-spoke caphat by W8UZZ. It increases radiation resistance and allows me to operate with even less coil exposed. I cannot claim to notice a significant improvement over the Scorpion caphat, but there’s something to be said for needing less coil to tune a band. The only drawback I’ve noticed is the additional wind loading at highway speeds. As a result, I prefer to keep my speeds at 65 mph or slower. That’s a fine speed on my local highways. However, If I’m traveling farther and on roads with higher speed limits, then I simply mount the 67-inch whip, which will tolerate flying at speeds that will send me to jail! 😉

All said, I think the Scorpion is a great purchase. Sure, I’m probably not maximizing its effectiveness the way I have it mounted. But it is a definite improvement over the ATAS-120A it replaces (I still use the ATAS for 6m). Better yet, the Scorpion will accept full legal power, which is 1500 watts for my non-ham visitors. That kind of power would be nuts in a mobile platform and probably would cause a lot of interference in the car. But adding a 500-watt amp isn’t out of the question. Maybe I’ll do that someday. Regardless, I’m very pleased to have an HF antenna that’s easy to install and remove. It gives me good performance on the HF bands while allowing me to return my car to its pretty-self in just five minutes. See more info and an install demonstration in this video.

Presto Chango,



About Scott

I grew up near Houston, TX and served in the U. S. Coast Guard for over 30 years. I have an electronics background and continue to work in the electronics engineering field. I taught myself the basics about automotive systems as well as how to perform some of my own maintenance (cars and bicycles). I became involved with Amateur Radio and computers in 1995. The explosion of technology has made my job and several of my hobbies quite interesting. My hobbies include Volkswagens, bicycling, photography, electronics, amateur radio, web management, and reptiles. Visit my websites to learn more.
This entry was posted in Ham Radio, Mods & Projects, Product Review. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Scorpion SA-680 Black Widow 10-80m Antenna

  1. n6atc says:

    Scott, this is a great article. I hope you are enjoying your mobile HF setup. Curt – N6ATC

    • Scott says:

      Thanks for the note, Curt! I do enjoy it, although it doesn’t stay on the car anywhere near full-time. It’s been off the car for a while because I’m behind on my QSL card duties. I treat sending QSL’s like debt: When I owe, I stay off the air (where I accumulate “debt”) until I’m caught up. 😉 I have new cards and need to format some mailing labels to implement an idea. 73, Scott

  2. Edwin Eklin says:

    Tnx for the article.. Info on aluminum spacer block such as manufacture.. Tnx Ed K8ZZ

    • Scott says:

      Thanks for writing, Edwin! The aluminum spacer is by Breedlove Mounts. I’ve added that detail to this write-up, as well as info about my W8UZZ caphat. Unfortunately, Breedlove Mounts no longer makes the spacer. The good news, though, is that it really isn’t necessary for bolting the antenna to a ball mount. 73, Scott

  3. Don says:

    Thanks for taking your time writing your experience with the different antennas you have used. I want to move to HF in my mobile rigs and want to buy a great product that others have had great experiences. Thank you for your service, our country and I appreciate it.

    • Scott says:

      Thanks for the note, Don! I don’t think I’ve shared an article about my new caphat by W8UZZ. I will make a video soon, which usually compels me to write a blog post. In fact, I need to add something about the FT-891 that I installed recently. I’m also on the verge of installing a TuneMatic autotuner that’s compatible with the Scorpion. Take Care!

Leave a Reply